Skip to Main Content
It looks like you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. This website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results.

EBIO 2110 -Tropical Biology

This library guide is designed to assist students in EBIO 2110 - Tropical Biology

Evaluating Your Information


  • Background information
  • Development and understanding of technical jargon and important terminology
  • Orient yourself to main issues, trends, history, dates and figures
  • Trustworthy encyclopedias will reference scholarly sources.
  • Very brief


  • General background information
  • Information is more detailed and broad compared to an encyclopedia entry but less specific and technical compared to a Journal article
  • Chapters help identify the main issues and themes of a topic
  • Scholarly books (not Penguin or Harlequin) have references, works cited, bibliographies, etc.
  • Take several years to be written and published. 


  • Many different types of articles available such as magazine, newspaper, scholarly or articles from trade magazines
  • Shorter in length compared to books but longer than encyclopedia entries
  • Published quicker than a book or an encyclopedia entry (more up-to-date)
  • Not always scholarly or suitable for academic purposes (see table on Different Types of article)!!!

Theses & Dissertations:

  • Lengthy in-depth papers written to satisfy the requirements for a Masters of PhD
  • Clearly stated on first page or under publication title that this is a thesis or dissertation
  • Significantly longer than a scholarly article but shorter than a book
  • Lengthy Reference list
  • Only evaluated by a small team of their peers (known) for the purpose of graduation
  • Not considered a scholarly peer-reviewed source. 

C- Currency  The timeliness of the information

·         How old is this material?

·         How far back do you really want to go (current research in science vs historical perspective? Facts that haven’t changed (e.g., we need oxygen to survive) vs.  a rapidly changing field of research.

·         Are all of the references cited outdated as well?

R- Relevancy  How relevant is the information for your topic

·         Is the information related to your topic?

·         Is it at a level that you understand (Highly technical meant for others with PhDs outside your field)?

·         Does it add something new to your paper/knowledge? Is this just used for filler?

AAccuracy  Accuracy/truthfulness of the information

·         Are there references or a bibliography/Works cited?

·         Is the information supported by facts and evidence (in-text citations)?

·         Has the information been peer-reviewed before publication

·         Are there spelling errors and typos? Is it poorly written?

AAuthority  The source and expertise of the author(s)

·         Can you identify the author/company/organization/source or sponsor of the article

·         How reputable is the Journal/magazine in which this was published?

·         Are the credentials given (PhD, MD, Team of physicians)

·         Is the author affiliated with a University, Think-Tank, Research Group OR hired by a company or an organization with a goal in mind?

·         What makes the person qualified to write on this topic? (expert vs student)

 P- Purpose  The intention of the information

·         Is it trying to sell, convince, teach, entertain or persuade?

·         Is the authors biased and if so is it clearly stated

·         Are there political, ideological, cultural, religious, institutional or personal biases?

·         Is it written objectively or impartial?

·         Does it have the words editorial, commentary, book review, opinion piece in the title?

Adapted from: Blakeslee, S. (2004). The CRAAP test. LOEX Quarterly31(3). Retrieved from

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.