Reproducibility in Research

Transparency and Openness Promotion (TOP) Guidelines provides a suite of tools to guide implementation of better, more transparent research.

Social, Behavioral, and Economic Perspectives on Robust and Reliable Science: Report of the Subcommittee on Replicability in Science Advisory Committee to the National Science Foundation Directorate for Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences

This webpage provides information about the efforts underway by NIH to enhance rigor and reproducibility in scientific research.

Product of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology (FASEB’s) 2015 Science Policy Symposium.

The MDAR checklist is a tool for authors, editors and others seeking to adopt the MDAR framework for transparent reporting in manuscripts and other outputs.

From Nature: This non-exhaustive list summarizes several elements of methodology that are frequently poorly reported

A checklist to help researchers critically access published literature. Based upon Dr. C. Glenn Begley’s “Six Red Flags for Suspect Work”

Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research. The Library contains a comprehensive searchable database of reporting guidelines and also links to other resources relevant to research reporting.

COS's mission is to increase openness, integrity, and reproducibility of research.

Increasing transparency in social sciences

Randall, D., & Welser, C. (2018). The Irreproducibility Crisis of Modern Science: Causes, Consequences, and the Road to Reform. National Association of Scholars.

Ioannidis, J. P. (2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLoS medicine, 2(8), e124.

Includes NIH training modules as well as training resources funded by NIH

Six webinars created in 2016