This guide provides resources and instructions on how to locate and document the following types of research impact:
A unique identifier allows you to distinguish yourself from other researchers. It can be used in journal and grant submissions and it allows you to standardize your research persona ensuring that you get recognition for your work. It is now required by many funders and publishers.
The - is an for quantifying scientific productivity based on publication record (an author-level metric). It was suggested in 2006 by Leo Egghe
The Journal I is a measure of the frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year. The JCR also lists journals and their and ranking in the context of their specific field(s).
Researchers at the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) have developed the Relative Citation Ratio (RCR). The RCR normalizes citation numbers across disciplines, so that articles from biomedical fields with different citation rates can be compared. The NIH says that it is using the metric to assess the influence of work that it has funded.
The RCR is calculated by dividing the number of citations a paper received by the average number of citations an article usually receives in that field. That number is then benchmarked against the median RCR for all NIH-funded papers.
For more information on the RCR please see this pre-print article: http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2016/03/30/029629
To calculate your RCR Score for free, visit iCite.
Journal Normalized Citation Impact: The Journal Normalized Citation Impact (JNCI) indicator is a similar indicator to the Normalized Citation Impact, but instead of normalizing per subject area or field, it normalizes the citation rate for the journal in which the document is publishing.
Category Normalized Citation Impact (CNCI) of a document is calculated by dividing the actual count of citing items by the expected citation rate for documents with the same document type, year of publication and subject area.
Altmetrics are statistics sourced from the social Web that can be used to help you understand the many ways that your work has had an impact with other scholars, the public, policy makers, practitioners, and more. They are useful supplementary measures of impact, best used in tandem with traditional measures like citation counts. Together, the two types of metrics can illustrate the full impact of your work.
There are very clear limitations to using the different types of metrics currently produced and used. Some of the limitations to the traditional metrics are as follows: