Skip to main content
It looks like you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. This website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results.

Predatory Publishers : A Guide

Learn how to evaluate the quality of journal publishers

What are "Predatory" Publishers

"These publishers are predatory because their mission is not to promote, preserve, and make available scholarship; instead, their mission is to exploit the author-pays, Open-Access model for their own profit.” (Beall, 2010)

"Journals exploiting gold open access, providing no or non-sensible peer review, undercutting standard article processing charges, while frequently publishing rubbish" (Beall, 2012)

Beall, J. (2010). “Predatory” open-access scholarly publishers. The Charleston Advisor, 11(4), 10-17.

Beall, J. (2012). Predatory publishers are corrupting open access. Nature489(7415), 179-180.

Types of Predatory Publishers

  • Totally False: illegitimate journals created for profit. Historically even reputably companies like Elsevier have created truly false journals.

  • Pseudo-scholarly: Publications that claim peer review, impact factor, and editing, but do not actually do these things. They may have longevity and hold conferences.

  • Hijacked: Publications that try to deceive by imitating established titles. 

  • Scam: Publications that take your money, but nothing is published.

Ojala, M., Reynolds, R., & Johnson, K. G. (2020). Predatory journal challenges and responses. The Serials Librarian, 78(1-4), 98-103.

What are the Risks?

  • Waste of Money: Often author publishing fees are quite high.
  • Unable to Resubmit: Since your work is published, you can not resubmit to a quality journal. 
  • Work Vanished: It is possible that the journal will never actually publish your work or the journal will disappear, leaving no trace (not archived)
  • Embarrassment: Your name will always be associated to this journal
  • Incorrect Information: Low quality, incorrect, and poorly peer-reviewed information made available to the public
  • Discredit Open-Access: Gives the inaccurate impression that OA journals lack quality control
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.